Semikkah7

06/26/2021 – Dr. Stephen Meyer on: “Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence of Intelligent Design.

This one comes in under 4 minutes – it certainly whets our appetite . But as I noted last week, boy did I get an four or so hour “blast from a fire hose” education with a dvd set produced by Dr. Stephen Meyer here of the Denter for Science and Center at Discovery Institute in Seattle. That seminary was very important at the time to our faith community for we were aware of how our younger generation was being indoctrinated into pagan ideology going into college, even in so called Christian Universities here in Texas like Baylor University. But we weren’t preparing our kids for the propaganda onslaught.

Unbelievable when you consider that atheism was becoming unheard of in the 18th century. And rightly so when you consider scientific advancements that shed so much light with the “big bang” and Einsteins Theory of Relativity and as Meyer points out here, the explosive discovery of DNA. You would think that the natural faith and logical conclusion is: “I don’t have nearly enough “faith” to be an atheist!? Even the question should be absurd at this point. So it goes with the global resurgence in the political arena of marxism.

And this Apologetics series will obviously transition into “The Case for Christ”. But it doesn’t work if people aren’t even recognizing God , our creator and creator of the Universe. You mean we came from nothing. As I have pointed out: Even the ancient Greeks had an early axiom that pre-dated even Socrates: “ex nihilo nihil fit” , or translated: “out of nothing, nothing comes.” So, don’t you need a “big banger” if you have a “big-bang”?

This is not about science at all, it is about denial of God. (yea, good luck with that…) On a milestone anniversary of Darwin’s birth, Charlie Fox asked about Darwin’s “Theory of Evolution” saying; “What does it all mean?” To my surprise, one of the Harvard professor guests answered honestly with: “It takes God out of the equation.” (That was the motivation that drove the absurd proposition.) It wasn’t science, as much as it was a religion. So, we can’t have prayer in our public gulag education system, but you can preach your pagan religion in our kid’s science classes, of course under the guise of “separation of church and state”. To add to it, that term is not even in the constitution. They used it not in reference to church denominations as Thomas Jefferson used it to his baptist friends, but to “worldview”. And how is it possible to separate our worldviews from any aspect of our life? It certainly wasn’t separated from the constitution, which was embedded with Christian worldview principles. That is what made it so uniquely “liberating” to the common man. And you shouldn’t have to be Christian to appreciate that.